In the case of Reed v. State, why was post-trial DNA testing denied?

In the case of Reed v. State, post-trial DNA testing was denied primarily because the judge found that the evidence had been tampered with. This situation indicates that there were concerns about the integrity and reliability of the evidence presented during the trial. When evidence is tampered with, it raises doubts about its authenticity and the validity of any conclusions drawn from it. Courts are typically very cautious about allowing tests on evidence that may have been compromised, as such issues can undermine the judicial process and lead to unjust outcomes. The decision to deny the DNA testing in this case underscores the importance of maintaining a strict chain of custody for evidence in legal proceedings.