Is it possible for contextual information to be both task relevant and irrelevant?

Contextual information can indeed be both task relevant and irrelevant, depending on the specifics of the task at hand. The relevance of contextual information often hinges on how it is applied within a certain situation. For example, in a forensic analysis scenario, particular background details may contribute to understanding a case and may be seen as highly relevant, while in a different context or another analysis, those same pieces of information could be considered irrelevant.

Moreover, the multifaceted nature of tasks means that different analysts or teams might interpret the same information differently based on their objectives or methodologies. Thus, contextual information can vary in its relevance based on how it aligns with the goals of the task, illustrating the fluidity of relevance in different analytical frameworks. This means that under certain circumstances, contextual details can serve both roles simultaneously, adapting to the needs of the task being performed.