True or False: Everything an analyst knows is imputed to the prosecutor if it contains exculpatory or impeachment information.

The statement is true because it reflects the legal principle known as "Brady disclosure," stemming from the Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland. Under this principle, prosecutors have an obligation to disclose to the defense any evidence that is favorable to the accused, including exculpatory information (which may prove the innocence of the defendant) and impeachment information (which may challenge the credibility of a witness).

This obligation extends to all information that the prosecutor has knowledge of, including what is known by any analysts or investigatory team members involved in the case. Therefore, the prosecutor is expected to consider all relevant information in their possession that could impact the outcome of the trial, ensuring that the defendant's right to a fair trial is upheld.

The other choices suggest limitations or conditions that do not align with the broader interpretations of legal obligations regarding exculpatory or impeachment evidence. The obligation to disclose such information does not depend solely on whether it is officially documented or explicitly shared in court; it encompasses all knowledge possessed by the prosecution, thus reinforcing the correctness of the true statement.