Under the Michael Morton Act, what should the state do if they discover additional evidence during a trial?

The Michael Morton Act mandates that when the state becomes aware of additional evidence during a trial, it has an obligation to promptly disclose this evidence to the defendant or the court. This act emphasizes the importance of transparency and fairness in the judicial process, ensuring that defendants have access to all pertinent information that could affect the outcome of their case.

Prompt disclosure allows the defense to adequately assess the new evidence, consider its implications, and prepare a response if necessary. This requirement is rooted in the broader principles of due process, which protect the rights of individuals in the criminal justice system. The act seeks to prevent wrongful convictions and ensure that justice prevails by fostering an environment of open communication regarding evidence.

Other options provide scenarios that do not align with the requirements of fairness and due process as outlined in the Michael Morton Act. Disclosing evidence to the jury, waiting until the end of the trial, or ignoring detrimental evidence would undermine the integrity of the trial and the rights of the defendant, which the act aims to protect.