What are the five pillars established in the Daubert case related to?

The Daubert case is a landmark decision that fundamentally changed the standards for the admissibility of expert testimony in legal proceedings. The five pillars established in this case focus specifically on expert testimony standards, emphasizing the need for reliability and relevance when presenting expert evidence in court.

These standards require that an expert's knowledge be based on sufficient facts or data, be the product of reliable principles and methods, and that the expert reliably apply these principles and methods to the facts of the case. This framework helps ensure that expert testimony is not only scientifically valid but also pertinent to the specific legal issues at hand. In essence, the Daubert ruling empowers judges to act as gatekeepers, determining whether expert evidence meets these established criteria before it can be considered by a jury.

Other options, while they may involve important aspects of the legal process, are not the focus of the pillars outlined in the Daubert case, which specifically address how expert evidence should be evaluated and treated within the judicial system.