What criteria were established in Kelly v. State regarding expert testimony?

In the case of Kelly v. State, the court established important criteria focused specifically on the admissibility of expert testimony and evidence. This framework is significant because it outlines the standards that must be met for expert testimony to be considered reliable and relevant in a legal context.

The criteria established generally revolve around factors such as the scientific validity of the techniques used, the qualifications of the expert, and whether the testimony would aid the jury in understanding complex issues. This ensures that only credible and dependable expert evidence is presented in court, which can significantly impact the outcome of a trial.

The other aspects in the other options—limits on types of testimonies, rules regarding the experience of expert witnesses, and procedures for cross-examination—while they may pertain to general practices in legal proceedings, do not specifically address the foundational aspects of how expert testimony is deemed admissible as dictated by the criteria set in Kelly v. State. Thus, the focus on admissibility criteria in the correct choice aligns perfectly with the pivotal role that such standards play in legal practices concerning expert testimony.