What should analysts base their conclusions on when making determinations in their disciplines?

Analysts should base their conclusions on methods that are accepted as valid because these methods have undergone rigorous testing and scrutiny within the relevant field. Valid methods have demonstrated reliability and are grounded in established research and empirical evidence. This ensures that the conclusions drawn are credible and can be trusted by stakeholders who depend on the analysts' findings.

Using methods that are considered valid allows analysts to provide a solid foundation for their conclusions, facilitating informed decision-making. This approach also promotes consistency and repeatability in analyses, reinforcing the integrity of the results. Conversely, relying on newly developed, popular, or untested methods can lead to flawed conclusions, as such methods may lack sufficient validation or acceptance in the professional community. This practice of relying on established valid methods helps maintain high standards in analytical work, ensuring that the outcomes are robust and reliable.