What was the conclusion of the court in Frye v. US?

The conclusion of the court in Frye v. US established that for scientific evidence to be admissible in court, the technique or method used must have gained general acceptance within the relevant scientific community. This standard, often referred to as the "Frye standard," emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the scientific evidence presented is credible and widely accepted by experts in the field before it is considered valid in legal proceedings.

This ruling highlighted the necessity of peer acknowledgment and validation of scientific practices, providing a safeguard against the introduction of unproven or controversial techniques that could mislead a jury or affect the outcome of a trial. Thus, the crux of the decision stressed the importance of foundational acceptance of scientific methods to uphold the integrity of courtroom evidence.