Which aspect is NOT a requirement for expert testimony?

The requirement that the analyst must have a personal connection to the case is not necessary for expert testimony. In legal contexts, expert witnesses are brought in to provide specialized knowledge and insights based on their expertise in a particular area, independent of any personal biases or relationships related to the case. This objectivity helps ensure that the testimony is credible and focuses on factual analysis rather than personal opinions or interests, which could compromise the integrity of the testimony.

In contrast, the other aspects listed relate to the standards and qualifications necessary for expert testimony. Accreditation of the laboratory ensures that it meets established standards, which adds credibility to the evidence and the conclusions drawn from it. Having a licensed analyst indicates that the expert has met the legal and educational qualifications required to perform their duties. Quality standards for laboratories further assure that the methods and processes used in the analysis are reliable and scientifically valid, enhancing the overall rigor of the evidence presented.